🔗 Share this article

Iran is ready to reinitiate atomic talks with the United States on condition that it is approached with "dignity" and "respect", Tehran's foreign minister has stated.

The Iranian diplomat said only diplomacy worked, and shared new appeals had come from mediators to reopen discussions with the Trump administration. He claimed Iran had zero undeclared nuclear sites, and Iran could not yet authorize the International Atomic Energy Agency to visit bombed nuclear sites for protective measures.

Navigating a Difficult Route

The foreign minister is navigating a challenging route since Iran wishes not to appear to be proceeding from a situation of disadvantage, and he insisted repeatedly that Iran had emerged more resilient in military terms and mentally from the coordinated strike on its nuclear sites in June.

He was talking at a defense forum in Tehran where he reaffirmed that Iran had "an inalienable right to enrich uranium domestically that it will never give up" – the main reason of the impasse in the previous talks.

Prior Discussions Suddenly Concluded

The earlier sessions of discussions between the US and Iran were concluded unexpectedly and hostile termination on 12 June when the Israeli government, with American backing, struck Tehran's atomic facilities in a fortnight-long engagement that culminated with the American leader asserting the locations had been eliminated. Afterward, European countries exercised their privilege to reimpose UN-wide sanctions, but Iran insists they have not had a substantial consequence.

Ideal Resolution Offered

Tehran representatives said they felt they had reached a "magic solution" to the nuclear fuel concern in prior discussions, when it was agreed an domestic cooperative with US participation could process nuclear material. Both sides would have been able to declare success since local refinement would have continued and the US could be certain that Iran's atomic project was entirely non-military.

It had not been agreed in the discussions that American atomic experts could operate inside Iran, but that was a reasonable assumption of the cooperative offer. Officials asserted three times they had secured an understanding with Trump's special envoy Steve Witkoff only for the agreement to fall apart due to "detractors in America".

Existing Position

Iranian officials declared the cooperative arrangement was now off the table, but it seems highly likely the offer could be resurrected in various formats if discussions reopen.

Trump recently stated he had been receiving messages that Iran desired to resume discussions, but in private Iranian officials state they are not yet getting coherent offers from the United States either explicitly or from important Middle Eastern intermediaries, such as Qatar, the Egyptian leadership, the Omani authorities and Saudi Arabia. The Iranian foreign ministry has been criticized of non-responsiveness in the face of Trump's direct instinctive approach, but Iran states diplomacy is not part of a performance.

Political Position

In his address to the conference, designed to depict the US as a dominant force that abuses the notion of global regulations, the foreign minister stated the fortnight-long engagement showed the dispute could not be resolved by military means. He stated the assaults started with a Washington's ultimatum for an unconditional Iranian surrender and culminated with an complete request for a truce.

Iran is convinced the opening assaults from Tel Aviv were executed with full US knowledge and coordination, making trust challenging to rebuild.

Negotiations Stays the Primary Resolution

Araghchi stated: "It was not Iran that had deserted negotiations; it was America and the western countries that had consistently tried to impose their demands during the discussions. Dialogue can still be active and remains the final resolution to resolve conflicts, but its standards, regulations and principles must be adhered to."

"If they address to the Iranian people with the tone of respect and respect, they will obtain a answer in the identical language."

Restoration and Reconstruction

In what is portrayed by Iran's diplomats as the struggle of repair and recovery, the foreign minister said he was certain Iran's security strengths "have significantly improved than before 13 or 14 June of this year. Every aspect of our defense have been restored. We gained many lessons from this engagement; we have discovered our own weaknesses and the shortcomings of the enemy."

He stated: "We effectively endured this war. Our enrichment knowledge, which they planned to obliterate, stays intact. The facilities and gear, if destroyed, will be restored; what is essential is the resolve of the nation of Iran and then the unity of the country that they targeted, but failed to break. The nation of Iran have grown more resilient, more united, and more backing of the government and the nation in the wake of this invasion."